The Development Sector at a Crossroads: Crisis or Evolution?
Having spent over a decade in the development field, I have
always been aware of the inherent risks and uncertainties. From the very
beginning of my career, I understood that while we teach farmers and
entrepreneurs about resilience and risk anticipation, we, too, must be prepared
for a sector that may not offer long-term job security. However, if development
work is truly a passion, survival will be possible, albeit through the
principle of 'survival of the fittest.'
The USAID Fund Crisis and Global Aid Cuts : The recent decision by the U.S. government to impose a 90-day pause on all USAID projects for review has sent shockwaves through the sector. Many had assumed that potential changes in USAID funding would only result in minor cuts or project suspensions. However, the reality is very disasterious. In the U.S. alone, approximately 1,600 USAID jobs have been lost, and the impact in aid-receiving countries is catastrophic. It is estimated that around 5,000 people in Nepal, working in 300 NGOs, consultancies, and nonprofits, are directly affected.
The humanitarian and health sectors, which are critical for
providing basic necessities such as food and medicine, are among the hardest
hit. The question remains: how will millions of people survive without the
support these projects provide?
The U.S. is not the only country slashing aid budgets. The
Netherlands has announced plans to cut its development aid budget by €2.4billion starting in 2027, reducing aid as a percentage of Gross National Income
from 0.62% in 2024 to 0.44% by 2029. Similarly, the Swiss Agency forDevelopment and Cooperation (SDC) has reduced its budget from CHF 2.16 billion
in 2024 to CHF 2.04 billion, leading to the closure of programs in Albania,
Bangladesh, and Zambia by 2028.
The UK (FCDO) is also following suit, with Prime Minister Starmer
cutting aid spending by 40%. These cuts come amid increased defense spending,
indicating a shift in priorities from humanitarian support to national security
interests.
The Unanswered Questions
These developments raise critical questions:
- What
will happen during and after the 90-day review period for USAID projects?
- How
will people who depend on development funding for basic needs survive?
- Is it
time to redefine the development sector?
- What
about the future of students who are preparing for careers in development?
A Need for Redefining Development Work
Over the years, I have worked on projects that have
genuinely benefited communities, providing real and lasting impact. However, I
have also witnessed projects that existed merely to meet numbers and targets
without creating meaningful change. The focus on distribution, demonstrations,
and short-term success stories has often overshadowed sustainable impact.
Moving forward, we must shift our approach. Instead of
simply securing funds, implementing projects, and reporting numbers, we need to
establish initiatives that create real and measurable change. Development work
should not be about ticking boxes but about ensuring that the resources reach
and benefit those who need them the most.
Development work is my passion. I am not just in this field as an employee but to create meaningful change in communities. I will continue to contribute as long as I can, regardless of my employment status. I have worked in remote villages even without formal employment, and I will keep doing so—with or without an official role.
Let us redefine this sector through collaboration and collective effort.
Thank you.
Comments
Post a Comment